GS
мне кажется это скорее показатель вырождения официозных акций, если уж туда массовку нагоняют. правильно ушли, чё
Не было там нагнанной массовки. Обычный рядовой ритуальный митинг
Size: a a a
2019 November 08
MM
А что я один что ли? Никому больше диалектика не интересна?
ЛL
Не было там нагнанной массовки. Обычный рядовой ритуальный митинг
Я не поверю, что у комросов не было проплаченой массовки из школьников и студентиков.
ЛL
Mr M
А что я один что ли? Никому больше диалектика не интересна?
Никому Попов не интересен.
MM
Никому Попов не интересен.
Опрос провёл? Где можно ознакомиться с результатами?
GS
Я не поверю, что у комросов не было проплаченой массовки из школьников и студентиков.
По крайней мере я не видел. Там полтора флага у них было
GS
Наша Союзная Демократическая Антиавторитарная Партия
MM
найс батруха неасилятора
MM
ВСТУПАЙТЕ В ММТ!
The biggest problem with articles advocating MMT is that they frequently make claims that:
1. Seem wrong.
2. Are not explained or justified.
Thus an MMTer might claim that monetizing a big budget deficit will drive interest rates to zero. I don’t see how one could make that claim, as the Fisher effect often dominates the liquidity effect. One way to address this confusion is with a mathematical model. But there is a much simpler solution.
“The theory that inflation results from an overheating economy might seem to rely on a primitive Phillips Curve model that was discredited during the late 1960s, but we still believe the claim to be true, because of X, Y and Z.”
1. Seem wrong.
2. Are not explained or justified.
Thus an MMTer might claim that monetizing a big budget deficit will drive interest rates to zero. I don’t see how one could make that claim, as the Fisher effect often dominates the liquidity effect. One way to address this confusion is with a mathematical model. But there is a much simpler solution.
“The theory that inflation results from an overheating economy might seem to rely on a primitive Phillips Curve model that was discredited during the late 1960s, but we still believe the claim to be true, because of X, Y and Z.”
ЛL
Mr M
найс батруха неасилятора
Пока что результат опроса: 100% опрошенных не интересует Попов.
ЛL
Mr M
The biggest problem with articles advocating MMT is that they frequently make claims that:
1. Seem wrong.
2. Are not explained or justified.
Thus an MMTer might claim that monetizing a big budget deficit will drive interest rates to zero. I don’t see how one could make that claim, as the Fisher effect often dominates the liquidity effect. One way to address this confusion is with a mathematical model. But there is a much simpler solution.
“The theory that inflation results from an overheating economy might seem to rely on a primitive Phillips Curve model that was discredited during the late 1960s, but we still believe the claim to be true, because of X, Y and Z.”
1. Seem wrong.
2. Are not explained or justified.
Thus an MMTer might claim that monetizing a big budget deficit will drive interest rates to zero. I don’t see how one could make that claim, as the Fisher effect often dominates the liquidity effect. One way to address this confusion is with a mathematical model. But there is a much simpler solution.
“The theory that inflation results from an overheating economy might seem to rely on a primitive Phillips Curve model that was discredited during the late 1960s, but we still believe the claim to be true, because of X, Y and Z.”
А как международная марксисткая тенденция относится с современной монетарной теории?
ЛL
Mr M
Догматик — да, но почему дурачок?
Потому что застрял в 92 году.
C2
А как международная марксисткая тенденция относится с современной монетарной теории?
Они уже же высрали статью.