I
Size: a a a
2019 December 22
S
Да, варарги принимает io.write, но только строчные аргументы можно передавать, ну или числовые. Это хоть и избавляет со стороны луёв от лишней конкатинации, но добавляет ровно столько же IO операций по записи, сколько аргументов передано было. Я вообще об этом случайно узнал пару лет назад, когда решил посмотреть, как работает функция io.write в целом.
Да, лучше уж конкатенировать на луёвой стороне ручками. По крайней мере сделано довольно прозрачно, что пишешь то и происходит.
S
Inscript "protection" it's nuts. Also user can easily hack it.
S
Base64 encryption, yea. Use plain text instead.
S
Luacoffee also looks like bit representation (like char -> bin -> replace 0/1 by stuff). I will try to decode it little later : )
S
Did you know the difference between encoding and encryption?
S
How what?
S
"how the difference" - it's incorrect.
I will not explain it to you, my answer will not changed: google it. And respond me what is this difference.
I will not explain it to you, my answer will not changed: google it. And respond me what is this difference.
S
Yes I can : )
S
Anyone can.
S
Have patience.
S
Easy.
1. I was restore "X" function (it's simple string split)
2. What is Mercy? Vikary maybe?
3. I was print what you "load" : )
4. 'Xx' was not defined, so it's simple empty string.
1. I was restore "X" function (it's simple string split)
2. What is Mercy? Vikary maybe?
3. I was print what you "load" : )
4. 'Xx' was not defined, so it's simple empty string.
S
No.
S
It's not an encryption. it's encoding.
S
Until you understand the difference, I will decode everything you write in the same way.
S
Omg 10mb of trash
S
It's not encrypted, just lua 5.2 bytecode.
S
So it can be decoded with this stuff: https://github.com/viruscamp/luadec
But I'm too bored to compile it : )
But I'm too bored to compile it : )
S
Yes, it's easy but I'm bored to search lua5.2 packages, downloading of vs2013 and compile it with stuff. Losing of 2-3 hours for trash.
S
But still easy. It's not an ENCRYPTION.