AR
У вас дока как описания на моем любимом порносайте, люди туда не по делу лазят, а поугарать
Size: a a a
2020 April 08
s
I read ProcessPoolExecutor is better for CPU
s
But i need to do memory stuff
s
So i guess ThreadPoolExecutor is better in this case
На гите ссылка сам знаешь куда
s
Basically.
I define a dict in main.
I update it from handlers.
The thread should look for a change in the dict. If there is a change do some stuff.
I define a dict in main.
I update it from handlers.
The thread should look for a change in the dict. If there is a change do some stuff.
AR
So i guess ThreadPoolExecutor is better in this case
Yep.
Ｆ
Basically.
I define a dict in main.
I update it from handlers.
The thread should look for a change in the dict. If there is a change do some stuff.
I define a dict in main.
I update it from handlers.
The thread should look for a change in the dict. If there is a change do some stuff.
maybe you need producer/consumer pattern?
s
Yep.
How can i run that thread from bot.poolling event loop?
AR
Basically.
I define a dict in main.
I update it from handlers.
The thread should look for a change in the dict. If there is a change do some stuff.
I define a dict in main.
I update it from handlers.
The thread should look for a change in the dict. If there is a change do some stuff.
Maybe you need to use loop.create_task or ensure_future?
s
Should i change it?
AR
Should i change it?
Change what?
AR
How can i run that thread from bot.poolling event loop?
Yep
s
Maybe you need to use loop.create_task or ensure_future?
Mhh yes
s
Change what?
Nothing. I was thinking of changing your pool executor to execute that thread as well
s
But i can use create task
.
кто знает как вывести message который отправил бот?
S
кто знает как вывести message который отправил бот?
куда?
.
куда?
принт хотя бы сделать, в телеботе это делается таким образом message-1
S
print(message.text)