Re: Open letter from researchers involved in the “hypo...
       
There is a major error made by the research group. It starts and ends here: "we did that because we knew we could not ask the maintainers of Linux for permission, or they would be on the lookout for the hypocrite patches."

I am a Red Teamer and work with companies to understand how their detective/preventative/recovery controls and processes are working. Here's how you resolve this:

You work with maintainers to get their coordination on the research. You work out a mechanism to prevent submitted patches from being merged (e.g. maintainers are notified before bad patches accepted by code review processes are merged).

You do not tell them when the patches are coming. You do not tell them which identities are going to be used for the patches (e.g. from which email addresses). You do not tell them which area of code will be targeted. You set rules and time bounds for the study.

You wait some amount of time before submitting such patches (weeks…

http://CppCon.org—Presentation Slides, PDFs, Source Code and other presenter materials are available at: https://github.com/CppCon/CppCon2017—C++11 introduce...

http://CppCon.org—Presentation Slides, PDFs, Source Code and other presenter materials are available at: https://github.com/cppcon/cppcon2016—This talk takes...