d
the real question
Size: a a a
2020 February 10
M
а на прошлое задание ты давал фидбек?
да, но там хуита
M
никак не ответили и ниче
d
ну я вот написал че-то
d
I have some notes on the "reviews" part, under the "non-news examples".
In tasks provided, there were quite a few review articles, which were not exactly "as part of a launch announcement", but which still, in my opinion, could be labeled as news. Such articles often fit under "comments about a specific recent event" and "news grouped together", being logical roundups of bits of information from, say, a past week's worth of news covering that topic. Also, they certainly may be more accurate and fact-proven, due to the nature of news vs such reviews.
So, to sum up, my two cents here is to mark above-mentioned roundup articles as news, what, I think, would benefit the end user. Thanks!
In tasks provided, there were quite a few review articles, which were not exactly "as part of a launch announcement", but which still, in my opinion, could be labeled as news. Such articles often fit under "comments about a specific recent event" and "news grouped together", being logical roundups of bits of information from, say, a past week's worth of news covering that topic. Also, they certainly may be more accurate and fact-proven, due to the nature of news vs such reviews.
So, to sum up, my two cents here is to mark above-mentioned roundup articles as news, what, I think, would benefit the end user. Thanks!
M
Whether or not overview of long-lasting topic is news.
For example, there was NYT article about cycling problems in the city, which did not refer to/was not based on any particular recent event, but was compilation of opinions (two-month window IIRC). Strictly speaking not news, but for sure could be interesting enough to read for locals.
Another (imaginary, there was no such article) example would be review of Brexit history/timeline (down to recent events).
For example, there was NYT article about cycling problems in the city, which did not refer to/was not based on any particular recent event, but was compilation of opinions (two-month window IIRC). Strictly speaking not news, but for sure could be interesting enough to read for locals.
Another (imaginary, there was no such article) example would be review of Brexit history/timeline (down to recent events).
d
никак не ответили и ниче
так не должны отвечать же
M
d
это типа просто "we will take a note"
M
а бля
M
ну я почему-то подумал что вопросы ок задавать
M
они ж правила пишут
d
ну да, нормально
d
но всё равно не ответят)
d
да и я как-то не очень помню чтобы телеграм особо слушал юзеров при написании правил
IP
Whether it's better to put article that loosely fits in actual category or in "Other".
Whether entertainment category fits articles that could disturb/upset people or it's just "happy" things.
- Someone dying?
- Celebrity having miscarriage/talking about her experiences with it?
- Tourist took photos of erupting volcano? (emphasis there is on tourist taking photos, so not Society)
Whether entertainment article that touches on racism, sexism and other society-issues (in different ways, from "Miss USA, Teen USA and Universe are all black!" to accusations) topics fall in "Society" or still "Entertainment".
i.e. https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/12/970161747603817330.html
Whether "Science" category is just "Health, Biology, Physics, Genetics".
https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/16/4945708898556354869.html -- no love for semiconductors/memory? Definitely out of "Technology" category, too abstract/technical (lol).
Whether "Health" in "Science" category means health in scientific terms or daily.
i.e. would article about health myths fall in: https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/16/5090408756696213671.html
"Cost of liver transplant in Pakistan" https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/12/1078940130382821457.html
and so on.
Whether article about game console is Technology (as it's a device) or Entertainment (as it's really about games)
https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/09/5246707018074319843.html
Whether WWE is sport or entertainment, lol.
Oh, and I put all WADA/Russia incident articles into "sports" as welp, formally speaking it can't be politically motivated. Yet halfway through I thought that it's probably wrong — i.e. it's big enough to fall in Society/Incident? It's hard to choice when you could pick only one category and it legit falls in both.
Whether entertainment category fits articles that could disturb/upset people or it's just "happy" things.
- Someone dying?
- Celebrity having miscarriage/talking about her experiences with it?
- Tourist took photos of erupting volcano? (emphasis there is on tourist taking photos, so not Society)
Whether entertainment article that touches on racism, sexism and other society-issues (in different ways, from "Miss USA, Teen USA and Universe are all black!" to accusations) topics fall in "Society" or still "Entertainment".
i.e. https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/12/970161747603817330.html
Whether "Science" category is just "Health, Biology, Physics, Genetics".
https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/16/4945708898556354869.html -- no love for semiconductors/memory? Definitely out of "Technology" category, too abstract/technical (lol).
Whether "Health" in "Science" category means health in scientific terms or daily.
i.e. would article about health myths fall in: https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/16/5090408756696213671.html
"Cost of liver transplant in Pakistan" https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/12/1078940130382821457.html
and so on.
Whether article about game console is Technology (as it's a device) or Entertainment (as it's really about games)
https://data-static.usercontent.dev/sampledata/20191209/09/5246707018074319843.html
Whether WWE is sport or entertainment, lol.
Oh, and I put all WADA/Russia incident articles into "sports" as welp, formally speaking it can't be politically motivated. Yet halfway through I thought that it's probably wrong — i.e. it's big enough to fall in Society/Incident? It's hard to choice when you could pick only one category and it legit falls in both.
Ахах, wwe
d
Whether or not overview of long-lasting topic is news.
For example, there was NYT article about cycling problems in the city, which did not refer to/was not based on any particular recent event, but was compilation of opinions (two-month window IIRC). Strictly speaking not news, but for sure could be interesting enough to read for locals.
Another (imaginary, there was no such article) example would be review of Brexit history/timeline (down to recent events).
For example, there was NYT article about cycling problems in the city, which did not refer to/was not based on any particular recent event, but was compilation of opinions (two-month window IIRC). Strictly speaking not news, but for sure could be interesting enough to read for locals.
Another (imaginary, there was no such article) example would be review of Brexit history/timeline (down to recent events).
по первому у нас почти одинаковый фидбек кстати
d
а, это самое
d
в конце будет один "победитель", я правильно понимаю?
d
нигде не было указано что несколько