А зачем? ;)

Просто так

If the transferring party no longer exists by the time the RIPE NCC has been informed, the receiving party must send both of the following:

An official document (issued by a national authority) confirming the closure of the transferring party.
A copy of an older signed agreement between the relevant parties mentioning the transfer of the assigned independent Internet number resources. If such an agreement is not available, the RIPE NCC may accept a confirmation of the transfer to the RIPE NCC signed by an authorised person (e.g. senior manager, legal successor) of the receiving party. The RIPE NCC reserves the right to reverse the transfer should another party object to this transfer and provide an agreement that proves that the Provider Independent address records should have been transferred to them.

А что, и так можно было?)

Очень интересно. Буду следить за вашим кейсом. Если закончится хорошо, то я им еще десяток таких пришлю.

Ха, вязли бы и поучаствовали

У меня уже очень много потеряно IP в аналогичных кейсах. Если у вас все закончится хорошо, то это похоже какие-то серьезные перемены в их политке.

Нет, так это выкопировка из из политики

самый низ

"issued by a national authority"
это много раз обсуждалось.

так это реестр же, россреестр, егрюл

суд, как тут предлагали, и т.п.

Коллеги, оперативно купим сети от /24 до /18

Освободилось 2-3 сети /22 в аренду.
долгосрок. сдаются кусками от /24

Коллеги, такой вопрос, посмотрел некоторые сети которые были на поддержке нетап, у части отсутствует спонсор, это как?

Сорри, орг таип лир

Еще один RIR внедрил inter-RIR transfer. Теперь можно передавать IPv4 из LACNIC .

https://www.lacnic.net/4711/2/lacnic/lacnic-starts-processing-inter-rir-transfers

Элвис вон внедрил DocuSign и громко хвастается.

This is new to us. That is why we are asking you to have a legal representative properly formulate the above claim and document it. We will then escalate to RIPE NCC's management and our legal department will review it.

Normally the legal successor would be listed as such in the chamber of commerce documentation. If he was appointed as liquidator of the closed company, there should also be a court document of him being appointed. That liquidator role would also be reflected in the chamber of commerce document.

If a Russian court will appoint a liquidator, he/she will have the rights to sell the IP addresses in order to settle existing financial claims against the closed company. If a director of the closed company wishes to retain the IP addresses, similar to normal assets, the director can make an agreement with the liquidator. The appointed liquidator can then sign on behalf of the closed company.

> What documents are required? Please provide an example of such a document?

A legal successor would be listed as such in the chamber of commerce (http://egrul.nalog.ru/). We have downloaded the latest extract from the Russian chamber of commerce, and are not able to find the former owner listed as a legal successor or as a liquidator.

We are not aware of the laws you mention which bypasses the above common practices. We kindly ask you to have a legal representative properly formulate this and provide documentation for our management and legal department to review.

Клиника, говорим про ликвидацию, смотрим налог ру но не применяем гкрф