ОРРУ

ладно...

Я ахуэла,но мне понравилось https://youtu.be/XAqq5yqR-T4

Крута

Это в C++

В java так же

Суть несёт одну и ту же

Я думал там тоже дженерики

Хз

Но по сравнению с C++, java и C# сосут

Почему это

Я чёт не припомню кардинальных отличий с++ от java/С# в этом плане

А они не в этом плане, они ввобщем плане

The following are the key differences between C# Generics and C++ templates:

C# generics do not provide the same amount of flexibility as C++ templates. For example, it is not possible to call arithmetic operators in a C# generic class, although it is possible to call user defined operators.

C# does not allow non-type template parameters, such as template C<int i> {}.

C# does not support explicit specialization; that is, a custom implementation of a template for a specific type.

C# does not support partial specialization: a custom implementation for a subset of the type arguments.

C# does not allow the type parameter to be used as the base class for the generic type.

C# does not allow type parameters to have default types.

In C#, a generic type parameter cannot itself be a generic, although constructed types can be used as generics. C++ does allow template parameters.

C++ allows code that might not be valid for all type parameters in the template, which is then checked for the specific type used as the type parameter. C# requires code in a class to be written in such a way that it will work with any type that satisfies the constraints. For example, in C++ it is possible to write a function that uses the arithmetic operators + and - on objects of the type parameter, which will produce an error at the time of instantiation of the template with a type that does not support these operators. C# disallows this; the only language constructs allowed are those that can be deduced from the constraints.

Ну это понятное дело

Источник https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/generics/differences-between-cpp-templates-and-csharp-generics

чарм не понимает моей идиллии!