Guuuuys. I got it.

You each have to define welfare

It looks like you two are speaking about different things

Accumulation of wealth and progress  in the destination and evacuation of them in the origin

this is a defective cycle actually

btw who is fluent in Rust?

@mersinvald is

yea seem like a Geek

also i think @insert_reference_here is also pretty fluent at that

The most adorable geek in this chat, yeah

моя толерантность к джире

ok thank you

Not really — meritocracy would thrive most in the equal opportunity environment, and welfare is the exact opposite of that.

When you give money just to the poor and unemployed it basically penalizes employment and self-development oriented at being competent in the free market

If you are hellbent on redistributing tax money, look at the UBI programs — it's way more balanced, you don't get confusion and conflicts about who's entitled to the cheque, and most importantly it provides means and an incentive for growth

Stop thaaaat

Whyyyyy

You're ruining my edgy internet persona

What stops you from being both, really?

It’s a bit like a tsundere