> when in fact the lead developers on Wayland are the actual Xorg maintainers.
Daniel Stone[0] incredibly funny and educational talk[1] from 2013 could help many critics who missed the 3 decade long ongoing discussion of why X is bad. We've talked about this already in the mid 90ies (when there were no alternatives) and now 8 years after this popular
linux.conf.au talk, people still having troubles understanding why X has always been a terrible tradeoff for both security and performance (well for literally everything).
[0]
https://www.fooishbar.org/about/[1] The Real Story Behind Wayland and X
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIctzAQOe44edit: BUT X IS THE UNIX WAY! << so what is the 1 thing X does, and what is it doing well?