или вот например, кто там конкретно лингвистические моменты запрашивал
> It might seem awkward right now to say “people who menstruate” or “people with cycles” but this is just like changing other biased language. It’s more accurate than saying “women” and using a non-gendered term also helps to make vital health information available to everyone who needs it—whatever their gender.
Even if they’re intended to be more inclusive, phrases like “female genitalia” or “female-bodied person” are alienating to some trans people. Such terms may label people’s bodies in terms they don’t identify with. These phrases may be difficult to replace, but it’s not impossible. Which term is most appropriate and respectful depends on the context.
Perhaps you want to say something to people who have a specific body part, like “people with vulvas” or “people with cervixes.” Maybe you’re talking about people who have bodies that function in a certain way: “people who can become pregnant” or “people who menstruate.” Then there are those affected by certain medical procedures: “people who need mammograms.”
https://helloclue.com/articles/cycle-a-z/talking-about-periods-beyond-gender