IP
А, нет
Size: a a a
2021 March 03
IP
Тогда интересно, но в GHC такой экстеншен есть (view pattern вроде)
I
Какие-то сравнения в хаскелем былы в докладе выше, насколько я помню AP все таки выйграл
с#
Language:
Source:
Result:
py3
Source:
import this
Result:
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
Beautiful is better than ugly.
Explicit is better than implicit.
Simple is better than complex.
Complex is better than complicated.
Flat is better than nested.
Sparse is better than dense.
Readability counts.
Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
Although practicality beats purity.
Errors should never pass silently.
Unless explicitly silenced.
In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
Now is better than never.
Although never is often better than *right* now.
If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!
IP
Language:
Source:
Result:
py3
Source:
import this
Result:
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
Beautiful is better than ugly.
Explicit is better than implicit.
Simple is better than complex.
Complex is better than complicated.
Flat is better than nested.
Sparse is better than dense.
Readability counts.
Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
Although practicality beats purity.
Errors should never pass silently.
Unless explicitly silenced.
In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
Now is better than never.
Although never is often better than *right* now.
If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!
I
В чем кек?
(
Language:
Source:
Result:
py3
Source:
import this
Result:
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
Beautiful is better than ugly.
Explicit is better than implicit.
Simple is better than complex.
Complex is better than complicated.
Flat is better than nested.
Sparse is better than dense.
Readability counts.
Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
Although practicality beats purity.
Errors should never pass silently.
Unless explicitly silenced.
In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
Now is better than never.
Although never is often better than *right* now.
If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!
Нечитабельная залупа
I
Так, стоп. Не просто запустить, но и дождаться. Я чёт не сразу посмотрел на код.
Сейчас отвечу в основе.
АХ
Это F#
Там кстати есть Active Pattern, которых нет даже в Haskell
Там кстати есть Active Pattern, которых нет даже в Haskell
А что такое active patterns?
АХ
А, прочитал выше. В хаскелле есть view patterns & pattern synonyms, не уверен, что они идентичны по фичам
IP
Language:
Source:
Result:
py3
Source:
import this
Result:
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
Beautiful is better than ugly.
Explicit is better than implicit.
Simple is better than complex.
Complex is better than complicated.
Flat is better than nested.
Sparse is better than dense.
Readability counts.
Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
Although practicality beats purity.
Errors should never pass silently.
Unless explicitly silenced.
In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
Now is better than never.
Although never is often better than *right* now.
If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!
не нужен, кстати
IP
слома обратной совместимости можно было избежать, хотя бы чтобы не вредительствовать
I
Так, стоп. Не просто запустить, но и дождаться. Я чёт не сразу посмотрел на код.
VP
ну в плане того, что String[] is Object[] они ковариантны
Можно присвоить туда - да. Соблюдает его контракт - нет.
AK
I
Фуух, хорошо что я на маке
AG
Фуух, хорошо что я на маке
Там уже флаттер?
I
Там свобода выбора 😌
I
Кстати посмотри, перестанут ли linux приложения выглядеть как говно,
после появления готового material-ui фреймворка
... или не в этом дело было 🤨
после появления готового material-ui фреймворка
... или не в этом дело было 🤨