KL
Есть серийные маленькие самолеты с встроенным парашутом.
если мотор накрылся - опускается на парашуте.
если мотор накрылся - опускается на парашуте.
Size: a a a
2021 June 09
A
Так глупость это же норма
Т
Я с нетерпением жду развязки. 2 или 3???
KL
Надесь не в среде инженеров 🙂
A
Вспомни как боинг макс делали
KL
Там менеджеры проектировали самолет
A
Это типо не считается?
JB
А откуда информация про "угол атаки" на корме у Airbus?
KL
вот например народ обсуждает - https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/19215/how-many-angle-of-attack-sensors-does-the-airbus-a-320-neo-have
KL
KL
во второй ссылке есть неплохой обзор почему 3 сенсора лучше для управления самолета компьютером, а 2 сенсора лучше для управления самолета пилотом.
KL
Что интересно A350 имеет 4 AoA сенсоров, не знал.
KL
т.е. все Airbus имеет не меньше 3ех сенсоров, но некоторые даже больше 🙂
JB
2
I think there are three angle of attack sensors in all Airbus planes using fly-by-wire systems.
Ключевое слово - think.
Я сейчас впервые услышала про кормовой/хвостовой флюгер.
I think there are three angle of attack sensors in all Airbus planes using fly-by-wire systems.
Ключевое слово - think.
Я сейчас впервые услышала про кормовой/хвостовой флюгер.
JB
Но я не авиаконструктор, а просто энтузиаст, потому тут, возможно, правы вы. Я информации не нашла, если честно, о физическом расположении третьего флюгера
JB
Вот тут, да, согласна на все 100%
KL
https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/app/themes/mh_newsdesk/pdf/safety_first_28.pdf
ну вот тут разбор инцидентов от airbus:
Only 2 cases of improper AOA protection activation occurred since the introduction of Airbus fly-by-wire aircraft 31 years ago. The first time was in November 2012 on an A330 aircraft after the introduction of conic AOA cover plates. All the conic plates were immediately removed subsequent to this event and the original flat cover plate design type was refitted.The second event occurred 2 years later on an A321 equipped with the initial AOA flat cover plate design. This is the only case of undue AOA protection activation with this configuration which has accumulated more than 300 Million flight hours. OEB48 for A320 family and OEB49 for A330/A340 family were however issued at that time to cover the risk of undue activation of AOA protection in case of multiple AOA blockage at a consistent high value. These OEB request the flight crew to keep only one ADR ON and switch off the other two ADR. This forces reversion to alternate law which will disable flight envelope protections and thus prevent inappropriate activation of the high angle of attack protection
ну вот тут разбор инцидентов от airbus:
Only 2 cases of improper AOA protection activation occurred since the introduction of Airbus fly-by-wire aircraft 31 years ago. The first time was in November 2012 on an A330 aircraft after the introduction of conic AOA cover plates. All the conic plates were immediately removed subsequent to this event and the original flat cover plate design type was refitted.The second event occurred 2 years later on an A321 equipped with the initial AOA flat cover plate design. This is the only case of undue AOA protection activation with this configuration which has accumulated more than 300 Million flight hours. OEB48 for A320 family and OEB49 for A330/A340 family were however issued at that time to cover the risk of undue activation of AOA protection in case of multiple AOA blockage at a consistent high value. These OEB request the flight crew to keep only one ADR ON and switch off the other two ADR. This forces reversion to alternate law which will disable flight envelope protections and thus prevent inappropriate activation of the high angle of attack protection
KL
упоминается 3 сенсора
KL
но я не готов искать чертежи airbus-а 🙂
KL
просто что б доказать что у них инженеры не дураки